{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Scenic America","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.scenic.org","author_name":"hlee","author_url":"https:\/\/www.scenic.org\/author\/hlee\/","title":"How legal precedent in the City of St Louis figured into the Austin v. Reagan Supreme Court decision | Scenic America","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"JIhcLZPwBR\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scenic.org\/2022\/05\/11\/how-legal-precedent-in-the-city-of-st-louis-figured-into-the-austin-v-regan-supreme-court-decision\/\">How legal precedent in the City of St Louis figured into the Austin v. Reagan Supreme Court decision<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scenic.org\/2022\/05\/11\/how-legal-precedent-in-the-city-of-st-louis-figured-into-the-austin-v-regan-supreme-court-decision\/embed\/#?secret=JIhcLZPwBR\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;How legal precedent in the City of St Louis figured into the Austin v. Reagan Supreme Court decision&#8221; &#8212; Scenic America\" data-secret=\"JIhcLZPwBR\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/www.scenic.org\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"http:\/\/www.scenic.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/us-supreme-court-building-2225766_1920.jpg","thumbnail_width":1920,"thumbnail_height":1280,"description":"With the April 21 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in favor of the City of Austin over Reagan National Advertising affirming the constitutionality of the longstanding distinction between content displayed on signs that are located on-premises and off-premises, it is fascinating to note how a 1919 opinion by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in a St. Louis [&hellip;]"}